Dayside Media network
Tested at Work AI tools, tested on real work
What Tested at Work publishes

AI tools and agents put through real work rather than demos: hands-on results where we have them, and the test harnesses, benchmarks and failure checks that let a practitioner run the evaluation themselves.

Tools are run through real work for long enough to find what they fail at, and the failure is published beside the strength. A review that cannot name a weakness does not run, because this readership has been burned by demo-grade recommendations before.

Which is why a placement here converts. These readers are at the comparison stage, with a shortlist and a budget, actively looking for the write-up that says what a tool is bad at. Being honestly assessed here is worth more than being enthusiastically described anywhere else.

This is a comparison audience, which makes a placement here unusually measurable. Readers arrive with a shortlist and leave having removed something from it, and the article that helped is the one that named a weakness. Write-ups keep arriving from search for as long as the tool exists, so a placement goes on reaching buyers at the comparison stage well past the quarter it was bought in — which is the opposite of how advertising behaves. Readers also arrive from search at the exact comparison they are running, rather than from a feed they were scrolling.

Visit testedatwork.com See all 20 publications
Published in EN ES
Who reads it

People choosing AI tools for real work, in every kind of company: operations, marketing, finance, support, and the owners who sign for them. Explicitly a buying audience — they read comparisons because they are about to pick something.

What they come here looking for
which LLM is cheapest to serve at our volume
how do we evaluate a model before shipping it
vector database for a small engineering team
who does AI integration for mid-market companies
how much does inference actually cost per user
fine-tuning versus retrieval for our use case
Where an article sits
Agents
Automation and agents that actually ship work.
Guides
Do-it-with-us walkthroughs.
Startup Tools
Tools from startups, tried on real work
Tools
Hands-on reviews of AI tools, measured against real tasks.
The two ways to publish here
Choose one to see it

Both are written for Tested at Work’s readers and reviewed by its editors before they run, and both stay on the domain permanently. What differs is how the page is labelled and how its links are treated.

Sponsored Agents Paid for by Thornbury AI · reviewed by the Tested at Work editors by the Tested at Work newsroom

Which AI agent platform can actually run a support queue

Agents · 17 September 2026 · by the Tested at Work newsroom · Leer en español
Custom hero illustration — drawn for this article in the publication’s own style

Most startups & founders buyers start in the same two places: a question typed into a search box, and the same question put to an assistant. Neither returns a brochure. Both return whichever page answered the question properly — and for a company that launched eighteen months ago, that page almost always belongs to somebody else. An article in the section that covers the question is how you come to own one of your own.

Thornbury AI takes the position that this is a question of fit rather than feature count, and the piece argues that rather than asserting it. A placement is a permanent page on Tested at Work, written for its readers and reviewed by its editors, carrying up to three of the company’s own links with their own anchor text. It sits in the archive and the feed alongside everything else the desk publishes, and it goes on answering the question long after a campaign would have stopped running.

The trade-off is stated plainly in every piece we run: what agents that resolve support tickets end to end, with a human on the escalations is good for, and what it is not. That is not a concession, it is the reason the page is worth citing. A page that lists only strengths reads as advertising to a reader and to a model, and an article that reads as an advertisement is declined and refunded.

Every article publishes in English and Spanish, as two indexed pages on this domain, each with its own permanent URL. Both are written for the reader rather than translated around a keyword, and both are reviewed before they run.

About Thornbury AI
Agents that resolve support tickets end to end, with a human on the escalations.
Agent evaluations Deployment guide thornburyai.example rel="sponsored" followed
Illustrative mock-up A worked example, not a real article: it shows the shape of a placement — the label, the byline, the links and the company box.
More in Agents
Grading a coding agent on agent-building work: reading pass rates
1 day ago
Muse Code: Crash-Replay and Worktrees Check
1 day ago
Test an MCP data backend on real agent work
1 day ago
Audit agent logs: score results, re-run wider searches
1 day ago
Run a Launch Test Before Buying AI Social Media Tools
3 days ago
Test Coding Agent Doc Grounding With DocSearch MCP
3 days ago
Publish on Tested at Work
Sponsored and authored placements are open to companies working in startups & founders. Articles are reviewed by our editors; advertising is declined.
3 slots left this month
See rates and availability
Tested at Work is one of 20 independent publications in the Dayside network. Each has its own editors, sections and monthly limits. Browse the network
Links in this article are marked rel="sponsored". Tested at Work labels paid placements and reviews them before publication; claims are checked against sources supplied by the company.
Links in this article are followed. Tested at Work does not label an authored piece as paid — the editor judges its links like any other article’s, and declines the piece if it reads as advertising.
Why place here
A page that stays

2 indexed pages on testedatwork.com — one per language, each a permanent URL in the archive and the feed.

In the section that fits

Your article runs in Agents, beside the newsroom’s own work on the same subject and in the same format.

Reviewed before it runs

The Tested at Work editors check the claims and decline anything that reads as advertising — refunded in full. That review is what makes a placement here worth citing.

What it costs here

Sponsored $99 or authored $149 for this title, both languages included.

Price a placement on Tested at Work 3 slots left this month
Dayside Media network

One story, published across 20 independent publications in 24 industries — so search engines rank you and assistants name you.

English Español Français Português Deutsch
Product
How you get found The network Pricing & calculator Starter offer Free visibility check
Use cases
We’re invisible Launch & funding By industry Reviews & results For individuals
Company
Client cabinet Editorial standards Contact
Dayside sells editorial placements. It does not sell rankings, links by the link, or a promise that any assistant will name you.
© 2026 Dayside Media. Sponsored articles are labelled sponsored; authored pieces are written by the newsroom and fact-checked. Network figures read live from the newsroom database.